Prediction of Noah Schlagenhauf [] vs Jeremy Schifris [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W W L L
Form
W L W W L W W W L LHead-To-Head: Schlagenhauf 1 - 1 Schifris
They have played 6 sets in total, with Schlagenhauf winning 3 and Schifris winning 3. The last match between Schlagenhauf and Schifris was at the M15 Lambermont, 19-08-2024, Q3, Clay with Noah Schlagenhauf getting the victory 3-6 6-2 11-9.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Noah Schlagenhauf | 1 |
| Jeremy Schifris | 1 |
| Schlagenhauf | Stats | Schifris |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (9-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | ||
| 22 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (62-47) | Career Total W/L | 53% (83-73) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Schlagenhauf VS Schifris H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 11-9 |
Stats 
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Jeremy Schifris
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
77%
(
53 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 6-3 2-6 11-9 |
Stats
Jeremy Schifris
Player
Noah Schlagenhauf
85%
(
63 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Schlagenhauf VS Schifris H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 38 | Games Won | 36 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:57:0 | Average Match Time | 1:57:0 |
| 55% (72/130) | 1st Serve % | 81% (116/143) |
| 69% (50/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (66/116) |
| 40% (23/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (13/27) |
| 44% (7/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 45% (64/143) | Return Points Win % | 44% (57/130) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Noah Schlagenhauf vs Jeremy Schifris Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schlagenhauf 1 - 1 Schifris
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schlagenhauf has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Schifris has won 38.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schlagenhauf, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schifris has won 51.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schlagenhauf has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schifris has saved 47.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schlagenhauf has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 12/ 9), with Schifris winning 58.67% (W/L 44/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schlagenhauf has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 62/ 44), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Schifris has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 44/ 34), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 16/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Schlagenhauf has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 12/ 9), where as Schifris has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.67% of matches (W/L 44/ 31). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Schlagenhauf winning 1 times and Schifris being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Schlagenhauf winning 3 and Schifris winning 3. The last match between Schlagenhauf and Schifris was at the M15 Lambermont, 19-08-2024, Q3, Clay with Noah Schlagenhauf getting the victory 3-6 6-2 11-9.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schlagenhauf and Schifris have played a deciding set 2 times, with Schlagenhauf winning 1 times and Schifris 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schlagenhauf winning 0, and Schifris 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schlagenhauf has played against opponents with an average rank of 57.76 while Schifris has played against players with an average rank of 21.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schlagenhauf has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schifris has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schlagenhauf has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schifris has converted 34.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Noah Schlagenhauf vs Jeremy Schifris Best Odds For The Match
Noah Schlagenhauf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Simon Beaupain
Player
Noah Schlagenhauf
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Kylian Collignon
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Jeremy Schifris
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
77%
(
53 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Henrik Thomas Neuss
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Noah Schlagenhauf
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Rafael Ymer
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
view more
Jeremy Schifris Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Jeremy Schifris
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Schifris
Player
Pietro Marino
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve %
60%
(
6 of
10)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
7 of
12)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
12
Total Points Won
14
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Schifris
Player
Gabriel Sardo
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeremy Schifris
Player
Yaniche Francis Boagnon
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Rivet
Player
Jeremy Schifris
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
74%
(
75 of
101)
11
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Schifris
Player
Martin Van Der Meerschen
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Massimo Giunta
Player
Jeremy Schifris
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
16
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
104
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(6) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Schlagenhauf vs Schifris?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Schlagenhauf Vs Schifris is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (62/47) | Win/Loss | 53% (83/73) |
| 56% (131/105) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (183/166) |
| 53% (1207/1054) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1690/1580) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 75 | Aces Total | 131 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 123 | Total Double Faults | 207 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 93.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 65.67 |
| 62% (2155/3453) | 1st Serve % | 70% (3565/5070) |
| 63% (1355/2155) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (2264/3565) |
| 48% (627/1298) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (685/1505) |
| 47% (186/397) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (222/506) |
| 43% (1556/3581) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2029/5116) |
| 56% (61/108) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (82/155) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 36% (5/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (9/27) |
| 58% (11/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (19/36) |
| 93% (60/56) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (83/71) |
| 7% (60/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (83/12) |
| 12% (49/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (73/12) |
See recent tennis photos of Schlagenhauf and Schifris
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
